Improving frameworks in order to reach the Industry 4.0 peak

New disruptive technologies associated with Industry 4.0 are changing how companies do business, and so finding a mechanism to adapt these new technologies to modern development needs is imperative. 

Improving frameworks in order to reach the Industry 4.0 peak

Dr. Tran Thi Quang Hong, head of the Department of Economic-Civil Legislation at the Ministry of Justice’s Institute of Legal Science, outlines how to soon make new technologies a reality in Vietnam by virtue of regulatory sandbox mechanism deployment.

A unified concept for regulatory sandboxes will help Vietnam expand its digital economy on a regional level
As the whole Vietnamese economy is seeing great implications from the Fourth Industrial Revolution, the local regulatory system is facing major challenges for revision and perfection to adapt to Industry 4.0 development requirements.

The first challenge involves the capacity to address newly-arising issues rationally.

Amid robust technology development, the knowledge gap between technology developers and policymakers is ­allegedly widening. Policymakers often find it hard to get a good grip of novel technologies, whereas their responsibility is to craft regulations to put such new tech under control.

Looking at the development of the passenger transport system based on car-hailing platforms such as Uber and Grab, we can see how difficult the work of regulators is to tackle new matters. While these companies have grown into major entities providing widespread services in the marketplace, Vietnam still lacks a compatible law to fix the service, leading to fierce social conflict and legal disputes between stakeholder parties.

The second challenge pertains to the adaption of laws to the fast pace of Industry 4.0. In fact, the legal system often lags behind social evolution, let alone technology development. The example of Uber and Grab attests to this reality.

As technology is developing at a galloping pace, the largest challenge to regulators is to ensure a law with balanced interests, while it could react flexibly to continually arising matters entailed by Industry 4.0.

Concept and role

A regulatory sandbox is a framework set up by agencies to allow small-scale, live testing of innovations by private companies in a controlled environment (operating under a special exemption, allowance, or other limited time-bound exceptions) under state authority supervision. When tested, mistakes and errors may appear that can be fixed at once to ensure the applications are of good quality for practical use.

Application is therefore increasing worldwide as many governments find a suitable management method to deal with new matters from technologies that are uncovered by existing legislation that cannot be changed overnight.

This mechanism allows the deployment of new ideas, through which providing opportunities for technology developers to prove social and economic benefits their ideas and technologies could bring.

Regulatory sandboxes also allow regulatory agencies to assess new technology aspects that are still uncovered by law, and on that basis introducing suitable guiding rules. They might forbid further deployment, allow further experimentation in a controlled manner, or allow wide application.

With these eminent ­features, this management method is supposed to perfectly match robust technology development pace in the digital age.

The first sandbox was launched in the United Kingdom in 2015, and many countries have followed suit. Singapore, Thailand, Malaysia, and Indonesia have formulated and implemented the sandbox in Southeast Asia thus far.

Regulatory sandboxes have been hot on the agenda at diverse policy dialogues on technology development in Vietnam in recent years. Many innovative startups and experts often make proposals recommending their use in business practice. Meanwhile, policymakers have also advocated the building of such sandboxes. Notwithstanding, such a product for testing new technology application is seemingly still absent in Vietnam.

In the status as a legal environment for testing new technology in Vietnam, regulatory sandboxes are attached to allowance and supervision of the management authority of a particular field and sector. These agencies by essence are administrative units whose functions are supervising legal implementation based on concrete principles.

 

Meanwhile, they only apply to matters derived from the use of fresh technologies that are still uncovered by existing legislation. Their application, therefore, requires state management authorities to go beyond common legal execution functions and hold certain initiative in implementing concrete management measures.

Efforts must also gear towards ensuring impartiality, efficiency, and seamless implementation of the testing process, avoiding abuse of power, and losing the opportunity of new technology application due to late enactment of relevant laws. These matters must soon be resolved to accelerate the formation of regulatory sandboxes in Vietnam.

In August the prime minister approved a project on promoting the model of the sharing economy in Vietnam which confirms the stance of “implementing new policy experimentation in deployment and application of new technologies in the sharing economy”.

The project entails fresh opportunities for regulatory sandbox models to go ahead in Vietnam, and in diverse fields of the local economy.

Until now, apart from being mentioned in the premier’s decision, no rule exists that provides a unified concept about regulatory sandboxes as well as how to implement them in practice. Meanwhile, deployment would involve multiple matters such as choosing businesses allowed to take trials; the type of technology allowed to go on trial; timeframe and space for experimentation; the supervisor’s responsibility during the trial process; and assessment requirements during the process, among other areas.

The factors for success

As law execution bodies, without requirements on responsibilities and certain exclusion principles, state management agencies might have no motivation in pushing up deployment of a regulatory sandbox in the fields under their management. In addition, as their deployment relates to selection, it is important to ensure transparency in selection criteria, allowing equal access to all stakeholder parties.

For those reasons, having in place a legal corridor for deployment in the current context proves very necessary, and that legal corridor must ensure satisfying the several requirements.

First, it must provide a unified concept about regulatory sandboxes, associated goals, and development approach. Second, it must allow state management agencies in particular fields and sectors to exercise certain rights in deployment of a sandbox in their fields. For instance, these bodies will be allowed to set selection criteria in choosing businesses or individuals to take on trial.

Third, the legal corridor should clearly define responsibilities of state management agencies in experimentation supervision and support in deployment process. Fourth, it has to set common rules for deployment, including the rules on space and time limits, and conditions for time and space extension if necessary.

Next, regulations have to clearly define the responsibilities of individuals and organisations partaking in the experimentation process. These entities might be exempted from several legal obligations such as having an operating license, but still obliged to handle civil and legal responsibilities.

Finally, a legal framework must be created to assess experimentation to ensure each trial project in a regulatory sandbox is fully assessed, leveraging diverse metrics such as social and economic benefits from new technology application, and the possibilities of risks towards consumers. VIR

Dr. Tran Thi Quang Hong

Head of the Department of Economic-Civil Legislation at the Ministry of Justice’s Institute of Legal Science

4.0 era: buy more robots or employ more workers?

4.0 era: buy more robots or employ more workers?

Vietnam is an attractive investment destination in the 4.0 era, but it has a weak point, limited automation capability.

Vietnam changes mindset for Industry 4.0

Vietnam changes mindset for Industry 4.0

Intelligence, science, technology, innovative ideas, and qualified human resources are the most important factors for development during the Fourth Industrial Revolution.

 
 

Other News

.
VIETNAM BUSINESS NEWS APRIL 30
VIETNAM BUSINESS NEWS APRIL 30
BUSINESSicon  30/04/2021 

Central province debuts first Ngoc Linh ginseng plant

Association calls for national gold exchange
Association calls for national gold exchange
BUSINESSicon  30/04/2021 

The Vietnam Gold Trading Association (VGTA) has proposed the establishment of a national gold exchange in Hanoi or Ho Chi Minh City.

Restaurant chains fall into crisis amid pandemic
Restaurant chains fall into crisis amid pandemic
FEATUREicon  30/04/2021 

The Tokyo Deli Restaurant on Nguy Nhu Kon Tum Street in Hanoi closed its doors two months ago for the Tet holiday, but it has now decided to never open again. The long Covid-19 pandemic has hit many restaurants hard.

Amid 'land fever', Can Gio district prohibits civil servants from working as land brokers
Amid 'land fever', Can Gio district prohibits civil servants from working as land brokers
FEATUREicon  30/04/2021 

Land prices in the HCM City suburban district of Can Gio have been soaring following the news that Can Gio will become an inner city district, or a city in the future. The local authorities have prohibited civil servants from acting as land brokers.

Multinational supply chain evades small industry
Multinational supply chain evades small industry
BUSINESSicon  29/04/2021 

Foreign investments in Vietnam have the ability to change the economics of many of the country’s support industries, who are continually struggling to be part of the larger supply network.

Four-month FDI totals $12.25 billion
Four-month FDI totals $12.25 billion
BUSINESSicon  29/04/2021 

In the first four months to April 20, foreign investors pumped 12.25 billion USD in Vietnam, equal to 99.3 percent of the amount recorded in the same period last year.

Hanoi developments induce delay fluster
Hanoi developments induce delay fluster
BUSINESSicon  30/04/2021 

Tens of millions of dollars poured into infrastructure together with new planning projects have added vibrancy to Hanoi’s real estate market, 

Construction firms face bankruptcy as steel prices soar
Construction firms face bankruptcy as steel prices soar
BUSINESSicon  29/04/2021 

Local construction firms face the risk of bankruptcy as the price of steel has soared 40 percent recently.

Vietnam looks to promote issuance of Gov’t bonds on int’l market
Vietnam looks to promote issuance of Gov’t bonds on int’l market
BUSINESSicon  29/04/2021 

Experts and economists have proposed to expand the issuance of Government bonds to the international market, 

Billionaire Pham Nhat Vuong builds 'entertainment city', considers billion-dollar deal in the US
Billionaire Pham Nhat Vuong builds 'entertainment city', considers billion-dollar deal in the US
BUSINESSicon  29/04/2021 

Billionaire Pham Nhat Vuong's company has recorded impressive business results despite the Covid-19 pandemic. 

Flower and ornamental plant production on the rise
Flower and ornamental plant production on the rise
BUSINESSicon  28/04/2021 

Flower and ornamental plant production has dramatically developed in recent years, bringing high economic value.

Contract enforcement, bankruptcy filings stall because of lack of regulations
Contract enforcement, bankruptcy filings stall because of lack of regulations
FEATUREicon  29/04/2021 

Vietnam’s judicial agencies seemingly cannot catch up with business environment reform. Two judicial indicators – contract enforcement and business bankruptcy – have not seen considerable improvement.

ST25 is a generic rice variety, not a brand: NOIP
ST25 is a generic rice variety, not a brand: NOIP
FEATUREicon  28/04/2021 

The National Office of Intellectual Property (NOIP) says the ST25 rice variety has been granted a Protective Certificate No 21.VN.2020 under Decision No 45/QD-TT-VPBH dated March 6, 2020 by the director of the Department of Crop Production.

49% of Vietnamese delete shopping apps on mobile devices
49% of Vietnamese delete shopping apps on mobile devices
BUSINESSicon  28/04/2021 

The increase in app deletions shows that Vietnamese e-commerce platforms need to improve the quality of services in order to retain customers.

Listed companies look to tap real estate segment
Listed companies look to tap real estate segment
BUSINESSicon  27/04/2021 

A series of listed businesses on the stock market have announced plans to expand and tap real estate investment.

More farming products sold on e-commerce sites
More farming products sold on e-commerce sites
BUSINESSicon  27/04/2021 

The e-commerce sites of Vietnam Post and Viettel Post saw 33 more suppliers of agricultural products and regional specialities open new booths in the first 10 days of April.

Recruitment demand soars in textile & garment, IT sectors
Recruitment demand soars in textile & garment, IT sectors
BUSINESSicon  27/04/2021 

The effectiveness of free trade agreements, especially the EU– Vietnam Free Trade Agreement, has helped to increase export orders for textile and garment enterprises in Vietnam, 

HCM City taxman wants to tax apartments for lease
HCM City taxman wants to tax apartments for lease
BUSINESSicon  27/04/2021 

The HCMC Tax Department has proposed piloting a plan to tax apartments for lease in five residential blocks in District 11.

VIETNAM BUSINESS NEWS APRIL 29
VIETNAM BUSINESS NEWS APRIL 29
BUSINESSicon  29/04/2021 

Fruit exports to the US thrive

Local banks target high profits
Local banks target high profits
BUSINESSicon  27/04/2021 

During the “season” of shareholders’ meetings, Vietnamese banks are confident about their plans to increase profits by several trillion dong in 2021. Several banks have set a record growth target of up to 30%-50%.

 
 
 
Leave your comment on an article

OR QUICK LOGIN