Vietnamese taekwondo athletes Kim Ha and Trong Phuc were left in tears after a controversial judging decision cost them the gold medal in the mixed pair event.
The dispute began when both the Vietnamese and Philippine delegations simultaneously filed formal complaints against the judging in the mixed pair category. The protests were dismissed, despite the errors being visibly clear to the naked eye - and organizers refused to allow a VAR review.
Kim Ha and Trong Phuc performing in the mixed pair final.
The officiating at SEA Games, especially in judged sports, has long been marred by bias, often favoring host nations or influential delegations. These issues have tainted the image of the tournament, earning it the cynical label of a "village pond" competition.
Refereeing favoritism - especially toward host countries - has become an infamous "tradition" in SEA Games history. Whether in football, martial arts, or artistic events, audiences have witnessed numerous athletes’ hard work and sweat being invalidated by a raised flag or an obscure scorecard.
The problem goes beyond human error. It reveals a deeper, systemic lack of transparency and, in some cases, deliberate interference in medal outcomes.
Earlier today, in taekwondo, Kim Ha and Trong Phuc went from celebrating what they thought was a winning performance to breaking down in each other’s arms.
Kim Ha shows visible disappointment after the controversial decision.
No one could truly understand the depth of heartbreak they felt in that moment.
The spirit of fair competition was crushed by blatant partiality. In sports, winning and losing are inevitable - but fairness is non-negotiable.
Following earlier controversies at the Thai-hosted opening ceremony and the Cambodian delegation’s withdrawal, SEA Games 2025 has already suffered a major blow to its integrity on day one, with Vietnamese athletes as direct victims.
When a sporting event is routinely influenced by non-sporting factors, its credibility begins to unravel.
SEA Games was originally envisioned as a platform to sharpen skills and foster regional solidarity.
But when athletes are forced to battle not only opponents but also prejudiced referees, their motivation is gradually eroded.
The psychological damage goes beyond the tournament itself - it plants seeds of distrust between participating nations and weakens the competitive spirit.
The biggest consequence of such biased officiating is that it stunts Southeast Asia’s development in international sports.
When athletes are conditioned to thrive in systems where technical standards are fluid and subjective, they face major setbacks on the Asian and Olympic stage.
There are at least three major consequences to this issue.
What began as a celebration quickly turned to tears for Trong Phuc after the loss.
First, differing standards. At SEA Games, a routine or strike might score well simply because of "local flexibility" in judging criteria.
Second, the lack of fair competition reduces the incentive for athletes to push their limits.
Third, mental unpreparedness. Athletes from the region are not trained to deal with the consistency and scrutiny of international refereeing systems.
This is why, despite a large population and abundant talent, Southeast Asia rarely achieves resounding success at global tournaments.
Of course, disputes over judging exist worldwide - such is human nature - but the frequency at SEA Games is alarmingly high.
This chronic unfairness continues to widen the performance gap between Southeast Asia and global sports powerhouses.
To prevent more heartbreaking scenes like those of Kim Ha and Trong Phuc - and to elevate SEA Games as a credible competition - the region must unite and push for a comprehensive overhaul of the refereeing system.
Vietnamnet.vn
Podcast
.svg){kind=icon}
