w anh 1jpg 41399.jpg
Hanoi’s Train Street remains a bustling attraction despite safety warnings. Photo: Archives.

Phung Hung’s Train Street, known for its narrow railway surrounded by bustling cafés, has become a must-visit spot for international tourists in Hanoi. But the question remains: should this vibrant area be preserved as a unique cultural experience or shut down over safety concerns?

Stretching across Dien Bien, Cua Nam, and Hang Bong wards in Hanoi’s Ba Dinh and Hoan Kiem districts, Train Street has repeatedly faced closure orders due to safety risks. Local authorities have set up barricades, posted bilingual warning signs, and stationed security personnel to enforce bans on café operations along the railway.

Despite these measures, tourists flock to the area for the thrill of sipping coffee while trains rush past, often disregarding the dangers.

Recent discussions on relocating the railway or shutting down Train Street’s businesses have sparked polarized opinions. Critics argue that the current unregulated operations pose significant risks, citing incidents where people have narrowly escaped oncoming trains.

However, supporters contend that Train Street is a cultural gem and a major tourist draw. Instead of imposing blanket bans, they suggest finding ways to balance safety and tourism.

"Why shut it down if we can manage it responsibly? Banning something outright because it’s hard to regulate is not the solution," one commenter noted.

Duong Van Tien, CEO of Tico Travel, believes that Train Street is a special attraction that encapsulates the charm of Hanoi, blending urban vibrancy with nostalgic railway aesthetics.

“Rather than prohibiting it, Hanoi should responsibly harness the unique value of this street,” Tien said, emphasizing the need for proper management to maintain its appeal while ensuring safety.

Drawing examples from abroad, Tien highlighted similar attractions like Maeklong Railway Market in Thailand and railway viewing spots in Japan, where clear safety protocols, designated viewing areas, and real-time train schedules have made such experiences safe and enjoyable.

Tien proposed detailed urban planning and the installation of safety measures such as barriers, warning signs, and designated observation zones. He also stressed the importance of engaging local café owners as stakeholders in safety and tourism initiatives.

“With effective management, Train Street can cater to the growing demand for authentic cultural experiences among international tourists while setting an example of sustainable tourism,” Tien said.

A transport expert echoed this sentiment, suggesting additional measures such as reducing train speeds, installing warning systems, and enforcing strict safety regulations for both tourists and businesses. Visitors could also be required to sign agreements to adhere to safety rules, with penalties for violations.

Hanoi’s Train Street represents a unique blend of culture, history, and modern tourism. Transforming it into a safe, regulated tourist destination could not only preserve its charm but also elevate it as a symbol of sustainable tourism in Vietnam.

By balancing safety with innovation, Hanoi can create a memorable and secure experience for both locals and visitors, ensuring Train Street remains a beloved highlight of the city.

N. Huyen